.
Feedback

We Need Urgent Action on Thousands of Sanduskys

State Rep. Dan Deasy discusses legislation that could help identify and stop child predators.

If Pennsylvanians have learned anything from the Jerry Sandusky case it’s this: when adults suspect child sexual abuse and don’t take action, it is children who pay the unthinkable price.

So, as millions point the finger at Penn State and vent their outrage over inmate Sandusky to co-workers, many are also quietly asking themselves, “Do I know any child who might be a victim of abuse, a child who needs help right now?”

To ask that question is to contemplate a heroic act: lifting an unbearable weight from a child’s shoulders and stepping in to be a protector.

Once we’ve examined our own individual lives and cleared our own consciences, there’s another question every citizen has a moral right to ask: “Does my government know about any children who are being hurt and need rescued right now?”

The answer to that question is yes.

Shortly after the Sandusky case made national headlines, I was contacted by a young woman in my district named Alicia Kozakiewicz. At the age of 13, Alicia was abducted from her Pittsburgh home by a child predator and held for four days. I remembered the kidnapping.

Alicia said she was alive today only because law enforcement zeroed in on evidence coming from the house where she was held captive. They tracked that evidence back through the Internet to her location, freeing Alicia from a basement dungeon and bringing her home.

Here’s what else Alicia told me: there are thousands of Pennsylvania children suffering sexual abuse right now, and law enforcement is in possession of electronic evidence that could lead directly to their locations. Yet, no rescue is on the way, because Pennsylvania law enforcement is criminally overwhelmed and underfunded.

If Alicia was right, the Penn State scandal would pale in comparison. Instead of Penn State officials failing to report the crimes of one predator, Alicia and her group, PROTECT, were telling me that Pennsylvania State officials were failing to act on thousands of suspected child predators.

My office, together with Rep. Mike Sturla, D-Lancaster, began investigating these charges, and what we found was shocking.

A national law enforcement nerve center called Round Up was patrolling the Internet (just as Alicia’s rescuers had done) identifying thousands of criminal suspects a day who were trafficking in video and photos of children being raped, tortured and abused. (Alicia’s captor also produced video of his crimes and shared them online.) Round Up is a national treasure. It has helped law enforcement investigators in all 50 states identify and arrest thousands of child predators and rescue thousands of child victims.

Every trafficker in the Round Up database is a dangerous criminal suspect, of course. But an estimated one in three is a hands-on abuser, with local child victims. That meant Round Up held evidence that could lead police right to the door of more Pennsylvania children than Jerry Sandusky ever hurt.

Here was the biggest surprise. The Round Up national nerve center is hosted on the computer servers of the Pennsylvania State Police.

How many Pennsylvania child predator suspects might be in the Round Up database? Congressional testimony, national law enforcement estimates and reports from Round Up itself indicate the number of unique suspects in Pennsylvania can be conservatively placed between 5,000 and 20,000.

One is too many.

More alarming, we know from arrest and prosecution data that most of these suspects are never arrested or prosecuted. Worse, large numbers of suspects are never even referred to local law enforcement agencies, leaving child-sexual predators at large in communities across Pennsylvania.

Thanks to Alicia, 37 state House members from both parties have joined me in introducing the Attorney General Mandated Reporter Act, legislation that would require the attorney general, or the Pennsylvania Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force should she delegate it, to report child predator suspects seen online to local law enforcement agencies right away, unless they are being actively investigated.

The bill, to be known as “Alicia’s Law,” also would provide funding to train local law enforcement agencies in this most dangerous of all cyber crimes, focusing their efforts on first responder activities that might identify child victims.

Since its introduction in April, Alicia’s Law has been bottled up in committee, and House leaders have refused to hold hearings. Every day the House leadership delays is another day that help won’t reach children in peril.

The next time you hear someone rage against those who kept Jerry Sandusky’s secret, please remember Alicia, and the children she wants to save today. I hope that every Pennsylvania citizen will join me in demanding urgent action to pass and fund Alicia’s Law.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Dormont-Brookline Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Johann Lynge June 13, 2013 at 03:54 am
@MCG - I appreciate how you perceived the situation and I apologize if that was in fact the case.Read More Like I said I was not privy to the exact conversation. However at the time it wasn't explained like that to me so I was unaware and handled it as I interpreted it. My apologies if I was mistaken.
Johann Lynge June 13, 2013 at 04:07 am
@Debbie L. Actually the police have not been to the pub in a long time. The last time they wereRead More there was because I called them because a man who was intoxicated (which we didn't serve because he is barred) came in and refused to leave. And I don't ever recall seeing the fire department there. But to blame it on the Pub is a misconception because even if you closed the pub there are half a dozen other bars on the blvd that everyone would then frequent. While Bob Dobbs recommendation of reinstating prohibition might sound like a good idea good luck with that. Prohibition didn't prevent drinking in the 20's and it wouldn't stop it now either. Ultimately we can not make everyone happy but we do our best to run a safe and friendly establishment. And I make it my personal mission to prevent any and all fights. Since I've been the door man (almost 6 months) we have only had 1 fight in the bar which was quickly broken up. We are not perfect. Nor is any other bar. But we constantly strive to make improvements. We are a community pub. We love our community and everyone in it.
Bob Dobbs June 13, 2013 at 01:23 pm
i should say that out of the handful of bars in the vicinity, i prefer the brookline pub if i'mRead More gonna go to a bar . i dont care for the younger kids that accumulate on saturday nights with that annoying ghetto music but the food specials are decent and they do stock a decent selection of beers . i find zippy's to be much more clique-y and narrow-minded .
Brad Birdwell June 10, 2013 at 09:18 pm
@Daria. My description is 100% accurate. Yes, the bouncer quickly handled the situation by claimingRead More he witnessed "the whole thing". And he did. He witnessed my friends and I waiting to order a drink. That's all. Nothing more. Nothing less. The description is not harsh, it's actually toned down in comparison to what actually happened. The bouncer said, "I witnessed the whole thing and you were being a ****. One customer standing in line to order. One customer flicking another customer's hood and getting in his face. Which one was wrong? Apparently me since I don't go there frequently.
Johann Lynge June 11, 2013 at 08:39 am
To everyone following this thread, I'm the doorman in question at the Brookline Pub. I've posted aRead More response to the original poster on Patch.com that can be found at the following address: http://dormont-brookline.patch.com/groups/opinion/p/in-response-to-the-post-brookline-pubhorrible-experience I implore everyone to read that response to hear my side of the story. Thank you.
Debbie L. June 12, 2013 at 09:36 pm
Brad,,i totally agree with ya 100 percent,,nothing but trouble there, when my son starts going thereRead More from time to time again, i know hes up to no good.
Erin Faulk (Editor) June 8, 2013 at 06:08 pm
Thanks for adding this, Drew! Article coming soon. If you have any photos from the games, pleaseRead More feel free to add the photos here, too.
Drew Lehman June 9, 2013 at 10:08 am
The game actually will be played at Green Twp. Park in Scotland Pa. (near Chambersburg)
JLMK June 8, 2013 at 01:36 pm
Hi there. My fiancee and i are interested. Can you inbox me? Jesskrchmar@Gmail. Com
coreylahey June 5, 2013 at 05:51 pm
But I reported on documented actions that happened within the community. Where is the violation?
Erin Faulk (Editor) June 5, 2013 at 05:54 pm
One was removed for personal attacks, another because it implied that there was corruption by aRead More specific person. Although you didn't name the person, it was implied. Since the corruption was never proven, I removed the comment. It's over. You're welcome to continue commenting as long as you follow the term of use.
coreylahey June 6, 2013 at 12:25 am
Yeah I guess the public online court records showing someone pleading guilty is not proof