.
Feedback

Newest Gun Law Expert- Bob Costas

Don't let talking heads like Bob Costas tell you that you're wrong to carry a firearm for self defense.

My position on firearms is well known, but for those who may have some doubt, I believe in the right to keep and bear arms as its expressed in the Pennsylvania Constitution, Article I, Section XXI. If you're not familiar with it, look it up.

I also believe in some sage advice my Dad gave me as a child, and reinforced over the years. "If you find yourself in a hole, the very first thing you want to do is drop the shovel." I listened to Costas use Sunday Night Football as a bully pulpit for gun control, and watched him again last night attempting to explain, on his own Thursday night sports show, what he really meant. It appears that Costas has rented a backhoe, as he's dug himself a hole deep enough that he'll likely need someone to pipe in sunshine for him.

Dragging out John McEnroe, who spouts Mayor Bloomberg's company line on guns, in order to seek some sort of approbation for his Sunday rant was predictable. McEnroe hates guns, and at the same time indicated that tennis players would never be placed in a situation where a gun might be an instrument to stop a crime. Beyond McEnroe's elitist view, he's got his head in the sand (or perhaps filling a body orifice). Nobody is, by virtue of the sport they play, guaranteed a free ride through life, never to encounter violence.

Charles Barkley, basketball great, and realist, told Costas that he carries a firearm now, and has since age 21 or 22. Costas feigned surprise that sports figures may carry a firearm for self defense. He related an anecdote about a particular pro football team, where of 80 guys, some 65 told their coach that yes, they carry firearms for self defense. And then the digging began. Rather than approach the situation with some sense of reality, Costas continues to insist that the mere presence of firearms will eventually result in a violent act, perhaps even a killing.

Barkley told it like it is. A white man could never had said, and communicated effectively, what Barkley did. He clearly stated that its a black problem in the black community, and as a black man he is closer to the reality than either Costas or McEnroe. You can read the commentaries at http://www.rgj.com/usatoday/article/1749025&usatref=sportsmod?odyssey=mod%7cnewswell%7cfeaturedtext%7cSports%7cp and make up your own mind.

If you want to rely on talking heads like Costas, who generally sounds fairly well prepared to present sports commentary, that's fine. Personally, I'm going to do my own research. For example, the National Academy of Sciences studied 57 gun control schemes. None worked, in their opinion. Lott and Kleck have done studies, and published a book entitled "More Guns, Less Crime", and find that guns are used some 2.5 million times every year to stop crime. Not surprisingly, the lame stream media doesn't put much stock in Lott or Kleck. They also don't tell you that in less than 1% of such encounters, are shots fired. And how does one explain the incredible increase in gun ownership over the past 4 years, but violent crime dropping off?

Sorry, Mr. Costas, but the Javon Belcher murder-suicide was more about crimes of violence towards women, lack of respect for oneself and others, and the predominance of gun violence within a narrow socio-economic demographic. I'm glad Charles Barkley said "Especially in the black culture, it's a crime culture. We, as black people, and I always say 'we', we won't have respect, we don't have respect for each other. We have more black men in prison than we do in college, and crime in our neighborhoods is running rampant. I know everybody reacts when something like the Belcher thing happens. But being black, this is something you deal with all the time, and it's just sad. I'm a guy and I carry a gun." Had those been my words, I'm sure I would be villified as a racist and a hater.

Ed M December 10, 2012 at 11:46 am
Very well said, John. Costas should stick to sports.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Dormont-Brookline Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Johann Lynge June 13, 2013 at 03:54 am
@MCG - I appreciate how you perceived the situation and I apologize if that was in fact the case.Read More Like I said I was not privy to the exact conversation. However at the time it wasn't explained like that to me so I was unaware and handled it as I interpreted it. My apologies if I was mistaken.
Johann Lynge June 13, 2013 at 04:07 am
@Debbie L. Actually the police have not been to the pub in a long time. The last time they wereRead More there was because I called them because a man who was intoxicated (which we didn't serve because he is barred) came in and refused to leave. And I don't ever recall seeing the fire department there. But to blame it on the Pub is a misconception because even if you closed the pub there are half a dozen other bars on the blvd that everyone would then frequent. While Bob Dobbs recommendation of reinstating prohibition might sound like a good idea good luck with that. Prohibition didn't prevent drinking in the 20's and it wouldn't stop it now either. Ultimately we can not make everyone happy but we do our best to run a safe and friendly establishment. And I make it my personal mission to prevent any and all fights. Since I've been the door man (almost 6 months) we have only had 1 fight in the bar which was quickly broken up. We are not perfect. Nor is any other bar. But we constantly strive to make improvements. We are a community pub. We love our community and everyone in it.
Bob Dobbs June 13, 2013 at 01:23 pm
i should say that out of the handful of bars in the vicinity, i prefer the brookline pub if i'mRead More gonna go to a bar . i dont care for the younger kids that accumulate on saturday nights with that annoying ghetto music but the food specials are decent and they do stock a decent selection of beers . i find zippy's to be much more clique-y and narrow-minded .
Brad Birdwell June 10, 2013 at 09:18 pm
@Daria. My description is 100% accurate. Yes, the bouncer quickly handled the situation by claimingRead More he witnessed "the whole thing". And he did. He witnessed my friends and I waiting to order a drink. That's all. Nothing more. Nothing less. The description is not harsh, it's actually toned down in comparison to what actually happened. The bouncer said, "I witnessed the whole thing and you were being a ****. One customer standing in line to order. One customer flicking another customer's hood and getting in his face. Which one was wrong? Apparently me since I don't go there frequently.
Johann Lynge June 11, 2013 at 08:39 am
To everyone following this thread, I'm the doorman in question at the Brookline Pub. I've posted aRead More response to the original poster on Patch.com that can be found at the following address: http://dormont-brookline.patch.com/groups/opinion/p/in-response-to-the-post-brookline-pubhorrible-experience I implore everyone to read that response to hear my side of the story. Thank you.
Debbie L. June 12, 2013 at 09:36 pm
Brad,,i totally agree with ya 100 percent,,nothing but trouble there, when my son starts going thereRead More from time to time again, i know hes up to no good.
Erin Faulk (Editor) June 8, 2013 at 06:08 pm
Thanks for adding this, Drew! Article coming soon. If you have any photos from the games, pleaseRead More feel free to add the photos here, too.
Drew Lehman June 9, 2013 at 10:08 am
The game actually will be played at Green Twp. Park in Scotland Pa. (near Chambersburg)
JLMK June 8, 2013 at 01:36 pm
Hi there. My fiancee and i are interested. Can you inbox me? Jesskrchmar@Gmail. Com
coreylahey June 5, 2013 at 05:51 pm
But I reported on documented actions that happened within the community. Where is the violation?
Erin Faulk (Editor) June 5, 2013 at 05:54 pm
One was removed for personal attacks, another because it implied that there was corruption by aRead More specific person. Although you didn't name the person, it was implied. Since the corruption was never proven, I removed the comment. It's over. You're welcome to continue commenting as long as you follow the term of use.
coreylahey June 6, 2013 at 12:25 am
Yeah I guess the public online court records showing someone pleading guilty is not proof