.
Feedback

Pulitzer-Nominated Journalist Opens Dormont Law Firm

Journalist-turned-lawyer Todd Spivak has opened his law firm in the heart of Dormont's business district.

Law and journalism have a lot in common, Todd Spivak said.

He’s qualified to make that comparison. Spivak is a professional in both fields.

The journalist-turned-lawyer opened in this summer. The location is familiar—his father’s business, is on the first floor of the same building on West Liberty Avenue.

“We want people in Dormont and Brookline to know that we’re here and we’re gearing our practice toward helping regular people,” Spivak said. “We’re not a law firm that works with corporations. We’re here for what everyday people need.”

The law firm handles criminal defense and DUI cases, as well as wills, estates, social security, and family matters, such as divorce.

Spivak grew up in Carnegie, but was frequently in Dormont. Dormont Vision Center has been in Dormont for 41 years, and Spivak said it’s nice to be home once again, and working in a place where he can see his father and brother everyday.

Spivak's career took him out of the Pittsburgh area for several years.

He never took a journalism class, but worked his way up from cub reporter to investigative reporter, covering city and state government, and the areas of government dealing with social services. He wrote for community newspapers in the Chicago area for several years.

Later, while working for a large news organization in Houston, Texas, his company twice nominated him for the Pulitzer Prize for his investigative reporting. He won a number of national journalism awards.

Then he went into law.

“I found that journalism and law dovetail in a lot of ways,” Spivak said. “With a lot of stories I was writing, I was working with injury lawyers and personal lawyers, and I admired a lot of them for the work they were doing. They were helping people.”

Spivak attended classes at Columbia University and received a Bachelor of Arts degree from a closely affiliated school, Albert A. List College. He earned a Juris Doctor degree from University of Colorado Law School.

While in law school, Spivak was a law clerk at the United States Attorney’s Office and represented clients in the Civil Litigation Clinic and Colorado State Public Defender’s Office. He also has worked at private law firms nationally and in downtown Pittsburgh.

Spivak and his family moved back to the Pittsburgh area last year, and now live in Banksville. He said plans to continue writing as much as he can while maintaining his law practice. He frequently writes columns for At Issue, which is published by the Pennsylvania Barr Association.

“In journalism, you’re highlight issues that people should know about. As a lawyer, you’re able to help in more of a direct way, which is satisfying,” he said.

Contact information, and information about services offered by the law firm can be found at the Spivak Law Firm website.

Follow Dormont-Brookline Patch on Facebook and Twitter. For more news, sign up for our email Newsletter.

Joseph M. Costanzo September 14, 2012 at 12:59 pm
Welcome back Mr. Spivak and good luck. It's always nice to see someone come home.
Todd Spivak September 14, 2012 at 01:27 pm
Thank you, Mr. Constanzo. It's great to be back. Please call if there's anything I can ever do for you: 412-344-4900.
Joan Hodson September 14, 2012 at 01:41 pm
Todd- here's to many years of success to you.
T&B T September 14, 2012 at 08:49 pm
“We’re not a law firm that works with corporations. We’re here for what everyday people need.” ..are normal people supposed to think "corporations" are bad??!! Your statement seems to imply that corporations are evil and that's ridiculous. What's up with that??!!
Erin Faulk (Editor) September 14, 2012 at 10:22 pm
T&B T, I don't think this quote was meant to imply that there is something wrong with corporations. I believe Todd Spivak's point was that his firm has a specific focus on family law and the needs of local people.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Dormont-Brookline Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Johann Lynge June 13, 2013 at 03:54 am
@MCG - I appreciate how you perceived the situation and I apologize if that was in fact the case.Read More Like I said I was not privy to the exact conversation. However at the time it wasn't explained like that to me so I was unaware and handled it as I interpreted it. My apologies if I was mistaken.
Johann Lynge June 13, 2013 at 04:07 am
@Debbie L. Actually the police have not been to the pub in a long time. The last time they wereRead More there was because I called them because a man who was intoxicated (which we didn't serve because he is barred) came in and refused to leave. And I don't ever recall seeing the fire department there. But to blame it on the Pub is a misconception because even if you closed the pub there are half a dozen other bars on the blvd that everyone would then frequent. While Bob Dobbs recommendation of reinstating prohibition might sound like a good idea good luck with that. Prohibition didn't prevent drinking in the 20's and it wouldn't stop it now either. Ultimately we can not make everyone happy but we do our best to run a safe and friendly establishment. And I make it my personal mission to prevent any and all fights. Since I've been the door man (almost 6 months) we have only had 1 fight in the bar which was quickly broken up. We are not perfect. Nor is any other bar. But we constantly strive to make improvements. We are a community pub. We love our community and everyone in it.
Bob Dobbs June 13, 2013 at 01:23 pm
i should say that out of the handful of bars in the vicinity, i prefer the brookline pub if i'mRead More gonna go to a bar . i dont care for the younger kids that accumulate on saturday nights with that annoying ghetto music but the food specials are decent and they do stock a decent selection of beers . i find zippy's to be much more clique-y and narrow-minded .
Brad Birdwell June 10, 2013 at 09:18 pm
@Daria. My description is 100% accurate. Yes, the bouncer quickly handled the situation by claimingRead More he witnessed "the whole thing". And he did. He witnessed my friends and I waiting to order a drink. That's all. Nothing more. Nothing less. The description is not harsh, it's actually toned down in comparison to what actually happened. The bouncer said, "I witnessed the whole thing and you were being a ****. One customer standing in line to order. One customer flicking another customer's hood and getting in his face. Which one was wrong? Apparently me since I don't go there frequently.
Johann Lynge June 11, 2013 at 08:39 am
To everyone following this thread, I'm the doorman in question at the Brookline Pub. I've posted aRead More response to the original poster on Patch.com that can be found at the following address: http://dormont-brookline.patch.com/groups/opinion/p/in-response-to-the-post-brookline-pubhorrible-experience I implore everyone to read that response to hear my side of the story. Thank you.
Debbie L. June 12, 2013 at 09:36 pm
Brad,,i totally agree with ya 100 percent,,nothing but trouble there, when my son starts going thereRead More from time to time again, i know hes up to no good.
Erin Faulk (Editor) June 8, 2013 at 06:08 pm
Thanks for adding this, Drew! Article coming soon. If you have any photos from the games, pleaseRead More feel free to add the photos here, too.
Drew Lehman June 9, 2013 at 10:08 am
The game actually will be played at Green Twp. Park in Scotland Pa. (near Chambersburg)
JLMK June 8, 2013 at 01:36 pm
Hi there. My fiancee and i are interested. Can you inbox me? Jesskrchmar@Gmail. Com
coreylahey June 5, 2013 at 05:51 pm
But I reported on documented actions that happened within the community. Where is the violation?
Erin Faulk (Editor) June 5, 2013 at 05:54 pm
One was removed for personal attacks, another because it implied that there was corruption by aRead More specific person. Although you didn't name the person, it was implied. Since the corruption was never proven, I removed the comment. It's over. You're welcome to continue commenting as long as you follow the term of use.
coreylahey June 6, 2013 at 12:25 am
Yeah I guess the public online court records showing someone pleading guilty is not proof