.
Feedback

Dormont to Change Street Sweeping Signs

Some signs are already posted, but could be changed again to avoid confusion.

New signs denoting street-sweeping information began appearing around a few weeks ago, and officials are working to clear up some confusion the signs created.

Some streets still have old signs, which display different street sweeping schedules than new signs on other streets.

Officials are looking in particular at signs placed on Dormont Avenue, where cars cannot be moved to the other side of the street for sweeping because Dormont Avenue is a one-way street.

Some signs seem to read that street sweeping will occur every week, but recreation director Gregor Saulsbery said it likely will occur only once a month. Stickers have been ordered for the signs to clear up the misunderstanding.

The signs should display correct information by April 1, when street sweeping is scheduled to start, and more information about the issue should be available by the end of this week.

Check back with Dormont-Brookline Patch for updates on this issue.

Follow Dormont-Brookline Patch on Facebook and Twitter. For more news, sign up for our email Newsletter.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Dormont-Brookline Patch? Find your Local Patch »

amy March 20, 2012 at 01:00 pm
Wow! I was very upset that these signs went up with no explanation. I am happy that less than two weeks before it is to start we FINALLY get some kind of explanation!
AiXeLsyD13 March 20, 2012 at 01:48 pm
So, where does one with on-street parking go to park when they live on a one-way street where the adjacent streets are already over-crowded... from 6PM Thursday night to 6PM Friday night?
A smaller window during working hours would be nice.
Drums45 March 20, 2012 at 02:18 pm
they tie up parking for 24 hours?? wow how stupid!
Shannon March 20, 2012 at 02:39 pm
Are you kidding me?! 6PM to 6PM?! WTF? Oh, Dormont, you're so ridiculous sometimes. I'd like to know what street sweeper is going to be running after 5PM on a Friday. I'd also like to know what sweeper is going to be running between the hours of 6PM Thursday and 7AM on Friday.
Dear Dormont, is this just another attempt to make more money ticketing? Why would you inconvenience your residents this way? I could completely understand between 8AM and 1PM on a day... or even 7AM to 5PM... but, this is just silly. For someone who doesn't drive during the week this is just another inconvenience. Thanks.
Jenny March 20, 2012 at 02:58 pm
I agree with Shannon! Dormont is ridiculous anymore and the street sweeping signs are just another reason why
Marie K March 20, 2012 at 03:49 pm
We need to park on street overnight should have cars off street by 7 am or be ticketed ludicrist if streets are not cleanef overnight
Lisa March 20, 2012 at 06:04 pm
I never noticed the sign change until a neighbor told me they were changed. I being a resident for 10 yrs totally understood that the sign ment once a month from April to Nov. I also was excited that it said to "park other side" my street is one way and I see no problem with that, being allowed to park on the opposite side once a month for street sweeping was like a reward, because moving the car to another street, with in the same zone so you didn't get a ticket, was tricky. I can see now that it was mentioned how someone not familar with the previous "rules" and schedule would be confused by the signs....
Don't get me started on street parking and the enforced times though!!!
AiXeLsyD13 March 20, 2012 at 06:12 pm
Coming soon: http://thereifixedit.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/white-trash-repairs-street-sweeper-in-hubei-china.jpg
Ed M March 20, 2012 at 06:36 pm
Ummmm it has always been a full day.
Lauren Sabo March 20, 2012 at 10:43 pm
I hope that this "confusion" with the street sweeping is fully cleared up by April 1st. Having gotten several of those $25 tickets, I feel that the street sweeping is a way to make Dormont quite a nice buck by collecting those fines. It used to be park on the opposite side during street sweeping; then it changed to being off the entire street from 7am to 2 or 3pm. The challenge was finding parking in another zone that was close by to walk back home. Now you have to move the cars the night before?? From 6pm to 6pm?? We better be able to eat off those streets they should be so clean!! Seriously, it is only going to be once a month? Not every week? Totally ridiculous!! And how are they going to notify residents of Dormont of these changes? Not everyone reads the Patch, the Boro newletter is not always timely and the website is not up to date either! Guess that they can post flyers on our cars... But the timeline to move the cars is REALLY STUPID!!
AiXeLsyD13 March 20, 2012 at 11:04 pm
I've lived in Dormont on a one-way street since 2004 . Parking has NEVER been moved to the other side of the street for street-sweeping day.
I have received a ticket (once) on street-sweeping day when I was sick, bed-ridden, and unable to remove my car. I paid it, because I was in the wrong (albeit out of my control). I'm sure the posted times have never been a full day. 7:00am to 7:00pm seemed to be the previous time, no? Or 8 to 8 or 6 to 6.
dormonter March 21, 2012 at 12:25 am
I think my sign says 9-4 not all day. Gets a little crazy when visitors like home health or repair people need to work and for my house the closest is two blocks away. Oh boy. If only the closest side street to me was not off limits the same day. A little change in the order of the streets to be cleaned would help. As would a fuctioning street sweeper. No more contracting it out to Green Tree!
Shannon March 21, 2012 at 12:41 am
What I used to do was drive in to work at 7AM and when I drove back over lunch I could park without fear of a ticket... It does not appear that will work any longer. Also, the idea that we can simply park on the opposite side of our one-way street on sweeping days is silly. The street is more often than not completely occupied. Further, people have been ticketed of late for parking in the Port Authority lot. (Guess where I live!...) I hope Dormont figures out a way to make the convenience of it's citizens a better priority.
Ed M March 21, 2012 at 11:23 am
I've lived in Dormont since 1980 and it use to be move to the other side on street sweeping days. They would do the non-parking side the day before then the parking side the next day. Now it appears they will be doing both sides in the same day.
Ed M March 21, 2012 at 11:24 am
Well, if ya ain't taking PAT, ya ain't allowed to park there! Read the signs!
Shannon March 21, 2012 at 01:24 pm
Actually, I take the T in every day. So, your comment is a bit misguided.
Ed M March 21, 2012 at 02:12 pm
My comment was on " Further, people have been ticketed of late for parking in the Port Authority lot." The locals think those lots are their own private parking lots. For awhile, there was a Roto Rooter truck parked in the Potomac Lot. Seriously doubt if the Roto Rooter man was taking the T.
Daniele Ventresca March 21, 2012 at 06:06 pm
To clarify, I attend the council meetings and the reason for the 24 hour time period is that they do not want cars parked on both sides of the street because that will cause traffic problems. If they kept the shorter time periods, then you would need to move your car back in the middle of the afternoon which is not feasible for most people who work during the day. The nice thing is that you are not going to need to move your car completely off the street and park 2 or 3 streets away.
AiXeLsyD13 March 21, 2012 at 06:27 pm
I envision complete and total chaos where cars drive up from Banksville Road/Dwight Ave. by the park where Dormont Ave. goes from 2-way to 1-way.
Say I get home from work at 5:00 or 5:30... Sometimes by 6:00pm I'm "in" for the night. At 6:00pm all of my neighbors and I are to go out and move all of our cars at once to the other side of the street? That doesn't sound like an absolute logistical nightmare? What happens when that 1 person doesn't or can't move their car? We're not a wide street like Alabama where people (regularly) illegally park on both sides of the street because there's room. There's barely enough room for the one traffic lane as it is. Both lanes would be blocked & it would be impossible to park around/near that vehicle, or to dive in a straight line up the road. This sounds like poor planning all around.
Erin Faulk (Editor) March 21, 2012 at 08:18 pm
I was just at the borough building and got more information on this issue. Basically, street sweeping will only occur the first week of the month—not every week. Also, there are a handful of streets where parking will not be allowed at all during street sweeping, but that is only for a two-hour time frame (not for the whole day). On other streets, cars would just need to be moved to the other side. I'll have a full article up tomorrow with a schedule for the streets. Thanks for reading and sharing thoughts, everyone!
AiXeLsyD13 March 21, 2012 at 08:28 pm
Thanks for the quick clarification!
Erin Faulk (Editor) March 21, 2012 at 08:46 pm
Sure! Admittedly, it's confusing. The borough has ordered stickers for the signs to make the dates for street sweeping more clear, so hopefully that will help a bit. The signs should be correct by April 1, when street sweeping begins.
Ed M March 22, 2012 at 11:21 am
Thanks for the article and schedule, Erin. If we had to rely on the borough, we would never get this info. The borough web site still has the 2011 schedule along with a lot of pertinent 2010 schedules.
Mike March 22, 2012 at 12:17 pm
Erin - If it's only for a two hour time frame then why are they telling us that parking is prohibited for 24 hours? Parking is only legal on one side of my street.
Another complete mess by the continuous trail of folks at the borough building. I've listened to everyone on this site take sides on various issues and argue politics. I've come to the conclusion that everyone in our local government are idiots.
LatoniaLVR March 27, 2012 at 03:50 am
Frankly this is overkill by local government. Past practice was no parking between 9 a.m. and 2 p.m. of the same day ... when most people were at work and most streets were vacant. Now we have a 24 hour window (as though street sweeping will occur between 6 P.M. and 8 A.M.) that serves as a back door tax on unfortunate residents who don't have the option of parking in off street spaces and get ticketed. Who thought this wonderful plan up? So if you have Monday street cleaning and want to have your family over for Sunday night dinner, make sure you have dessert before 6 p.m. so everyone can get out and move before the ticketing occurs. Please let me know if anyone else wants to start a recall petition. This is another government action that brings in to question the competence of elected and appointed officials. Most neighborhoods in this borough could use a twice annual street sweep in Spring and Fall. This is just ridiculous. What happens if you park on the other side of the street but cannot move your car due to work commitments keeping you late? Will the police give a grace period? This all seemed to work fine before with a narrow time frame and was not overly intrusive. Under the old system, on our street, by 11 a.m. the sweeper had performed their duty and all was well.
Ed M March 27, 2012 at 11:31 am
I would agree the overnight restriction is pointless. I think the reasoning is to make sure that side of the street is empty in the AM. 8AM to 6PM makes more sense. And those who don't move their vehicles should be towed and ticketed.
LatoniaLVR March 27, 2012 at 10:43 pm
It's a back door tax masquerading as a benefit. 9 to 3 so working people can leave in the morning and come home and not have to play musical cars. The borough should concern themselves more with ticketing people who ignore the stop signs throughout this garden spot of Western PA.
Daniele Ventresca March 27, 2012 at 11:09 pm
Just an FYI, the changes to street cleaning have nothing to do with generating increased revenue from increased ticketing. This idea has been brought up by multiple residents at multiple council meetings over the last two years. This is the way street cleaning used to be done many years ago and nobody could come up with the reason it was changed. I, for one, am thrilled that I will not have to move my cars two or three streets over. Yeah, it is for a longer time period but there are people who work during the day and take public transit so moving their cars back at 2 pm is impossible. The reason for the 24 hour period is so that there will not be cars parked on both sides of the street at any time. In order to accomodate everyone, they had to make a longer time period. If you are so bothered by this, go to the council meetings and get involved. I do not think one person brought up any objections to this change and ,if I recall correctly, every council member voted in favor of this plan.
Leigh March 28, 2012 at 02:06 am
If I remember correctly it was brought up at a few Council meetings why the street cleaning method was changed. It was because the buses were having problems making turns on the Kelton side of the borough because of how close the cars were to the corners.
LatoniaLVR March 28, 2012 at 03:09 am
Glad that you are thrilled. If Dormonts finest flag our car for being parked on "the wrong side" on a Sunday night you can offer to cover the cost. It's overkill ... 24 hours for a one hour job. I've been to counsel meetings over other matters and found them irresponsive unless the issue was a hot button item like the skate park. People taking public transit ... hmmm ... I guess they could park at the Castle Shannon or Dormont T stations early enough and move their cars back whenever they so choose. Maybe other streets have a problem with accumulated trash in their neighborhood streets which require monthly cleaning but ours would be fine with a twice year cleaning. Taking whole blocks of parking away during overnight hours only creates more problems versus the majority of people who can 8 to 4 or 5 it and not be infringed upon. BTW ... going to council meetings and being involved. That is why we vote for elected representation. If we have to micro-manage council then get rid of them and have public referendums on every issue. That would make for a truly democratic form of government and would take less time than sitting through council sessions.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Johann Lynge June 13, 2013 at 03:54 am
@MCG - I appreciate how you perceived the situation and I apologize if that was in fact the case.Read More Like I said I was not privy to the exact conversation. However at the time it wasn't explained like that to me so I was unaware and handled it as I interpreted it. My apologies if I was mistaken.
Johann Lynge June 13, 2013 at 04:07 am
@Debbie L. Actually the police have not been to the pub in a long time. The last time they wereRead More there was because I called them because a man who was intoxicated (which we didn't serve because he is barred) came in and refused to leave. And I don't ever recall seeing the fire department there. But to blame it on the Pub is a misconception because even if you closed the pub there are half a dozen other bars on the blvd that everyone would then frequent. While Bob Dobbs recommendation of reinstating prohibition might sound like a good idea good luck with that. Prohibition didn't prevent drinking in the 20's and it wouldn't stop it now either. Ultimately we can not make everyone happy but we do our best to run a safe and friendly establishment. And I make it my personal mission to prevent any and all fights. Since I've been the door man (almost 6 months) we have only had 1 fight in the bar which was quickly broken up. We are not perfect. Nor is any other bar. But we constantly strive to make improvements. We are a community pub. We love our community and everyone in it.
Bob Dobbs June 13, 2013 at 01:23 pm
i should say that out of the handful of bars in the vicinity, i prefer the brookline pub if i'mRead More gonna go to a bar . i dont care for the younger kids that accumulate on saturday nights with that annoying ghetto music but the food specials are decent and they do stock a decent selection of beers . i find zippy's to be much more clique-y and narrow-minded .
Brad Birdwell June 10, 2013 at 09:18 pm
@Daria. My description is 100% accurate. Yes, the bouncer quickly handled the situation by claimingRead More he witnessed "the whole thing". And he did. He witnessed my friends and I waiting to order a drink. That's all. Nothing more. Nothing less. The description is not harsh, it's actually toned down in comparison to what actually happened. The bouncer said, "I witnessed the whole thing and you were being a ****. One customer standing in line to order. One customer flicking another customer's hood and getting in his face. Which one was wrong? Apparently me since I don't go there frequently.
Johann Lynge June 11, 2013 at 08:39 am
To everyone following this thread, I'm the doorman in question at the Brookline Pub. I've posted aRead More response to the original poster on Patch.com that can be found at the following address: http://dormont-brookline.patch.com/groups/opinion/p/in-response-to-the-post-brookline-pubhorrible-experience I implore everyone to read that response to hear my side of the story. Thank you.
Debbie L. June 12, 2013 at 09:36 pm
Brad,,i totally agree with ya 100 percent,,nothing but trouble there, when my son starts going thereRead More from time to time again, i know hes up to no good.
Erin Faulk (Editor) June 8, 2013 at 06:08 pm
Thanks for adding this, Drew! Article coming soon. If you have any photos from the games, pleaseRead More feel free to add the photos here, too.
Drew Lehman June 9, 2013 at 10:08 am
The game actually will be played at Green Twp. Park in Scotland Pa. (near Chambersburg)
JLMK June 8, 2013 at 01:36 pm
Hi there. My fiancee and i are interested. Can you inbox me? Jesskrchmar@Gmail. Com
coreylahey June 5, 2013 at 05:51 pm
But I reported on documented actions that happened within the community. Where is the violation?
Erin Faulk (Editor) June 5, 2013 at 05:54 pm
One was removed for personal attacks, another because it implied that there was corruption by aRead More specific person. Although you didn't name the person, it was implied. Since the corruption was never proven, I removed the comment. It's over. You're welcome to continue commenting as long as you follow the term of use.
coreylahey June 6, 2013 at 12:25 am
Yeah I guess the public online court records showing someone pleading guilty is not proof