patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

UPDATED: Child Killed In African Painted Dog Exhibit at Pittsburgh Zoo

The 2-year-old fell into the painted dogs exhibit and was mauled, according to Pittsburgh Police.

 

UPDATED: A 2-year-old child was killed at the Pittsburgh Zoo & PPG Aquarium Sunday morning after being mauled when he fell into the African painted dogs exhibit.

"It is with heavy hearts we report that a tragic accident occurred this morning at 11:45 a.m. when a young child fell into the African painted dog exhibit area and was killed," the zoo stated on its Facebook page.

"The accident is under investigation by both the Zoo and the Pittsburgh Police Department. The Pittsburgh Zoo & PPG Aquarium will remain closed until further notice."

The child was with his 34-year-old mother, of Pleasant Hills, at the African painted dogs exhibit when he fell from the top of a platform railing to the ground inside the pit area, according to a statement from the Pittsburgh Bureau of Police.

The child was immediately attacked by 11 dogs inside the pen, and was later pronounced dead at the scene as a result of the attack, police said.

Zoo personnel were able to secure 10 of the dogs, but not the final dog due to aggressive and violent behavior, according to the police statement.

When Zone 5 police officers arrived and entered the pit, the dog continued to exhibit extremely aggressive behavior toward the child and the officers, police said.

Both officers fired multiple gunshots and killed the animal, according to the police statement. 

Homicide investigators have interviewed several witnesses and zoo personnel, and the investigation is ongoing, police said. 

They are asking anyone who witnessed this incident to call the Pittsburgh Homicide Unit at (412) 323-7161.

The child's parents are being treated for trauma, according to police.

A news release distributed by zoo officials said keepers cleared seven of the 11 dogs after the child fell into the exhibit, the PG reported.

Darts were shot into the exhibit to scare the dogs away from the child, but "unfortunately, the dogs were in pack mentality and not responding," according to the news release.

African painted dogs are an endangered species, according to the zoo's website.

Earlier this year, the zoo closed when the painted dogs reportedly escaped from their area.

Correction: The child's age is 2; earlier reports listed his age as 3.

Patch will be monitoring developments on this story. Check back for updates.


Follow Dormont-Brookline Patch on Facebook and Twitter. For more news, sign up for our email Newsletter.

Related Topics: African Painted Dogs, Boy Killed at Zoo, Child Mauled, Pittsburgh Zoo, Pittsburgh Zoo and PPG Aquarium, and Pittsburgh police

Henry Filbert

7:08 am on Monday, November 5, 2012

Very sad story. Will surely have negative outcries about the dogs. The dogs are not to blame, how did a 2good year old get onto a vantage point that could allow this accident to happen? Was the mother responsible for his being where he shouldn't have been?

Reply

Sixfiddy

7:14 am on Monday, November 5, 2012

Very sad !
My question : How can any responsible parent risk the life of their child by sitting/standing him on a four foot fence that known to hold wild painted dogs ? My heart goes out to the child .... my anger goes out to the irresponsible parent that played a part in this child's death.

Reply

Terry Freeborn

7:16 am on Monday, November 5, 2012

I am very sorry for the parents and sensitive to their grief, however....why would you put a 2 yr old on the railing??? Also, those dogs are extremely close to being extinct, that woman's bad judgement resulted in her childs death & the animal's death! Very, Very Sad!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Crystal Mariie

9:55 am on Monday, November 5, 2012

Maybe the boy couldn't see, and he wanted to look. I don't believe it's "Bad Judgement" at all. I'm sure there are a lot of people that have done it and this kid just happened to be unlucky. The zoo should have proper guarding up so things like this can't happen. You can't go throwing the blame at the parents for a choice they made so the child could enjoy the zoo. Maybe those things should all be shot, they killed a boy. They are freakin' dangerous.

Comment_arrow

Stevie Evans

10:44 am on Monday, November 5, 2012

Crystal - of course they are dangerous, they're WILD dogs. The tigers and lions and bears are dangerous too. As well as the snakes, the sharks, the elephants.... you do know what a zoo is dont you?
About 50 feet down the walkway from where this mother was with her child is another vantage point that is an enclosure with thick plexiglass walls that allow you to see the dogs up close and personal. If her son couldnt see, they could have gone there for a better view. There is NEVER any reason to break the rules just so you can get a better look.
There are RULES to the zoo and the exhibits (like dont stand, lean, or sit on the fences enclosing the exhibits) for a REASON. That reason being to keep not just YOU safe but to protect the animals as well. That dog that was shot was only following his instinct. To him it wasnt a 'child' it was food and a bunch of other predators were trying to take his food away. I'm not saying the police were wrong to shoot - but they didnt shoot the dog because he was a 'bad dog'. These are NOT PETS.
My heart hurts for the family and I dont know how, as a mother, you ever get past something like this - especially when your own momentary lapse of reason is responsible.

Comment_arrow

ed

11:21 am on Monday, November 5, 2012

Bad judgement is placing your child on top of a railing of a 14ft drop. That's like letting them hang out on the edge of a second floor window. The ground kills people too but you shouldn't go around shooting at the dangerous ground.

Donna Mathis

7:32 am on Monday, November 5, 2012

I can't imagine what these parents are going through. The mother will never be the same. I would like to think I would have jumped into the pit to try to save my child. She was probably in shock. I hope people will treat her with kindness. It might help her survive this horrible tragedy.

Reply

Lolo1972

9:16 am on Monday, November 5, 2012

I would have jumped in broken bones and all to save my son. I would have sheltered him. If I would have died oh well. God bless all of them

Reply

Crystal Mariie

9:52 am on Monday, November 5, 2012

They should of had appropriate coverage for that area so kids nor adults could EVER fall in. Especially if they knew that these "dogs" were so aggressive. This is such a sad sad story. No child should ever go through this. I would have jumped over and protected my son with my life. I would have fought them off of us. This is such a ridiculous thing to hear about..

Reply
Comment_arrow

erika

11:11 am on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Perhaps you should stay away from the zoo if you feel you might have to break the rules. The zoo would not be the zoo if it housed domestic cats and dogs. While I am sorry for the mother/family and her loss, this is truly tragic; the zoo has rules and is not to blame.

Melissa Greer

10:03 am on Monday, November 5, 2012

My heart goes out to the parents. I think its harsh the way she's being judged for something I'm sure a lot of people do. She has to live with this tragedy for rest of her life. She has to replay the horrific incident over & over ahain. There should be a barrier preventing someone from falling into that exhibit as well. Also the same animals escaped in May. So they definitely at this point need to put the animals in a more secure exhibit.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Stephanie

11:44 am on Monday, November 5, 2012

The dogs dug under a fence into their own "back up yard" which is not open to the public. Irellevant.

Comment_arrow

Ryan

3:58 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

The animals are in a pit with fencing around it and a barrier along with signs everywhere indicating that people shouldn't lean over or stand on the barriers.

A lot of people do it but that doesn't make it a good idea, a lot of people do drugs, a lot of people drink and drive, a lot of people do all kinds of dumb activities and when they act recklessly, we blame them for the negative outcomes of those decisions, and we hold them accountable.

She gets to live with this tragedy, but her ineptitude cost her child its life, cost the child's father his son, all because she couldn't heed a warning, or common sense.

There is a barrier and there was no escape, most exhibits have redundant areas for the animals to go as another safety precaution.

Jenny

10:42 am on Monday, November 5, 2012

I read else where that it is not confirmed that the boy died from being attacked by the dogs but he may have died from the fall. What's the scoop Erin?

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Erin Faulk

11:51 am on Monday, November 5, 2012

At this time, we only have the information that the zoo has released. When more information is available, it will be published.

Stephanie

11:06 am on Monday, November 5, 2012

I agree with everything Stevie Evans said....I know that enclosure, and I know there is an area with clear glass that they could've gone to. This is poor judgement by the mother, nothing else. I will not take away from the pain she is feeling, and I feel terrible she has to go through this. But sadly, someone is to blame here, and that is the mother. Not the zoo, not the dogs, not the child. Pittsburgh Zoo meets or exceeds all safety requirements, this is a fact.

Reply

Stephanie

11:33 am on Monday, November 5, 2012

And about the dogs escaping back in May, that instance is irrelevant to this case. The dogs were not running around the zoo causing havoc. They had dug under a fence into their own "back up yard" that was still a part of their exhibit and is closed off to the public. So please, before even referring to that instance, know what you are talking about.

Reply

Jamie23

12:20 pm on Monday, November 5, 2012

To everyone saying the mother should have jumped in to save her child--check out some videos of African Painted Dogs on Youtube. You would never think that an animal smaller than a German Shepard could be so vicious. They are not even comparable to pet dogs. You can't say what you would have done unless you were there... So at least check out footage of these amimals before you continue to judge. Yes, the mother should have NEVER put het child in that position but after the fall i highly doubt that she (or anyone) would have been able to save him with their bare hands.

Reply

Ryan

1:15 pm on Monday, November 5, 2012

Great people, lets blame the zoo for low fencing or the wild animal for doing what wild animals do - typical response

The mother was at fault here, she acted like a moron, plain and simple, and if I was her husband and the father of the child, I would be absolutely irate at her. That child is dead because she failed to act like a responsible adult. Her actions were blatant reckless endangerment and she should be charged with such, her actions got her child killed.

People pleading for understanding and sympathy contribute to this culture of someone else is to blame. You choose to have a child, she chose to take that child to the zoo, and she chose to put her child in harms way. She made bad choices. Sure, 99/100 times a parent does this, nothing goes wrong, most times people drink and drive, nothing goes wrong, but when it does, they are caught and punished accordingly and the same concept applies here.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Amanda King

2:19 pm on Monday, November 5, 2012

You said a mouthful there, and I totally agree. All actions, be they good or bad, have consequences. If you do dumb things, you get dumb or undesirable results. I cry for that little baby, and I will never be the same after hearing this horrible story. I could care less about the mother. She should know better, Period!

Amanda King

2:11 pm on Monday, November 5, 2012

I am very sad and hurt over this young child's life being taken in that manner. I only pray to God that he died from the fall, and didn't know anything after that. I am sorry people, but the mother is irresponsible and should be charged with child endangerment and failing to protect her child's welfare and safety. As horrific as this is, everyone is moaning over the poor mother. What about that poor little baby who looked up to momma for his protection? When you do stupid crap, you suffer stupid consequences. She needs a psychiatrist to have her brain examined, thoroughly. Who the hell would put their baby up on a ledge, fence, or whatever, for any reason, to see wild animals, knowing that this child could probably fall to his death? I hope she never has anymore kids, ever, if she loves them like this.

Reply

Gary

4:40 pm on Monday, November 5, 2012

The people on here that are condemning this women make me sick! If you ask me, you are even more savage than the dogs in this story. It's not like she was dangling th child over the pit. She obviously lifted him up there for a better look, and something went wrong. You'd probably feel it was just if she ended up taking her own life over her grief or guilt. All the people (including the mother) involved in this incident need support.

Reply
Comment_arrow

erika

11:16 am on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

I have been taking my five year old to the zoo four years, since he was one year old. Sometimes it is much more difficult to say "Honey, I know you want to get a better look at the pretty dogs, but look, the sign says we can't and there must be a reason for that! I am sorry that you are frustrated that you can't get a good view of them, but it is just too dangerous. Maybe we will get a better view if we move on. Notice how nobody else is holding his/her child up there too look; I think it might be because it is not permitted." I know it is very hard to listen to the whining, but that is our responsibility as a parent.

loran

4:42 pm on Monday, November 5, 2012

It is the mother's fault and she was holding on to the child properly that baby would have never fell. In common sense you do not put a child on a rail like that you keep them on the ground or you hold them that is very irresponsible parenting. And yes that was my child I would have jumped in and sheltered my child she should be put in prison for that because basically she killed her son

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Erin Faulk

5:21 pm on Monday, November 5, 2012

Loran, I have deleted your comment because profanity is not allowed by the Patch Terms of Use: http://dormont-brookline.patch.com/terms

Please feel free to re-post your comment without swear words. Thanks.

Reply

loran

6:32 pm on Monday, November 5, 2012

This lady really needs to b charged. The only person who should get the sympathy is the child and father. Due to him not being there. The mother had NO BUSINESS putting that poor baby at risk. He is two he didnt know better. She did. What that women did makes me so angry, i been crying all day and i dont even know these ppl. I have a 2 year old and it really breaks my heart. This is the worst thing that i have had bother me this bad in a very long time. Two year olds can hardly balance on ground let alone on a 14 ft cliff. That was stupidity all around. Something that should have never happened.

Reply

loran

7:09 pm on Monday, November 5, 2012

How can family stand there and watch that poor baby get ate. Words cant even describe wat i think. It is not the zoos fault. It is the irresponsible mothers fault. Wat was going through thats idiots mind. Something needs to be done. Nobody Surely is that dumb to be so careless. As she was putting that sweet baby at risk she should have been totally focused on him. Wow is,all i can say. Its so sad it dont seem real.

Reply

loran

8:41 pm on Monday, November 5, 2012

And now i read that the fall did not kill him.None of the worthless ppl did anything to save the poor thing. That idiot mother will live her life knowing she could have saved her son two different times but DID NOT. That sweet boy had to feel the pain. Most ppl that cared would have jumped in to get their child but not them. Humm kinda odd if u ask me.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ryan

4:01 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

I agree the mother should be punished and she if anyone, should have made an attempt to save her child.

Once that child ended up in the pit though, it was over. Those dogs attack fast, just like a pack of wolves or lions or tigers. That was a long fall and that child sadly didn't have a chance. An unarmed stranger jumping into an enclosure with dangerous animals, would have simply added another fatality to an already sad incident.

sean j denti

9:35 pm on Monday, November 5, 2012

You people do know that the railings are designed with the knowledge that children will be held on them, that's why they have that angle on them. Please before you blame anyone for something that they did remember that you really don't know what happened and honestly your opinion is helping anyone or anything except to feed your ego. Have some compassion.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Stephanie

8:46 am on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

I am sorry but you are wrong, a zoo would NEVER design a fence with an angle as a seat for a child. Fences are there for protection, not a seat.

Chloe

9:46 pm on Monday, November 5, 2012

All of you on here are correct, that mother better be charged with this!! She absolutley knew that the zoo had animals that were vicious if something came into their territory. i have a 14 month old little boy and i know my son looks up to me for protection. My son would NEVER be on a ledge like this let alone fall. but if i was ever in this situation i would of jumped down and saved my son! those dogs could maul me to death not my son! i hope this woman lives her life knowing that its HER fault her babyboy is dead. this is a sad sad horrific story. she didnt even TRY to save her son which makes me the most mad! this mother needs to be evaluated and checked for no brain cells!!! i watch my son at all times even if he is on the floor and she was so careless. oh well, i will get closure of this story by saying god took his little angel back home & he is safe now. god knew she wasnt a good mother so he took this precious innocent little baby home.

Reply

loran

10:02 pm on Monday, November 5, 2012

Wow so ignorant. The zoo has signs for ppl like u and her saying to stay off. And wat i said is not blame it is the TRUTH buddy.

Reply

loran

10:03 pm on Monday, November 5, 2012

Chloe i absolutely agree with you 100%.

Reply

Ed M

7:20 am on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

This is a tragic accident. Tossing blame around is not what people should be doing. Praying for the family of the toddler who perished is what people should be doing.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ryan

3:54 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

So if your wife were to drink, drive, and kill your child (example), but it was an accident, she just made a mistake, a temporary lapse in judgement - she shouldn't be held accountable?

Closing your eyes and wishing better for the family isn't nearly as effective as making an example of her so other idiots don't perpetrate the same behavior.

Comment_arrow

Ed M

9:50 pm on Saturday, November 10, 2012

Apples and oranges Ryan. Drinking and driving is not remotely close to what happened here. Prayer for this family is what's called for.

Comment_arrow

Ryan

12:39 am on Sunday, November 11, 2012

More so apples to pears. They are different but they aren't that different.

How are they so different? In drinking and driving, you choose to take an amount of drinks, then you choose to do something unsafe that could harm yourself or others. You think of yourself before anything else. It is a choice and one begets another. It is poor judgement and selfishness at the root cause.

Here, again, poor judgement is the root cause. As a mother, what good can come of putting your child on an unstable surface bordering a pit of vicious dogs? How much thinking was she really doing. Did she think that kid was going to remember this experience? She acted foolishly, without thought, and her actions took the life of someone else, not so different than drinking and driving. The mother is the one at fault here, no one else.

As for prayers, who am I praying for and what good is it actually doing? I have no well-wishes for the foolish mother. I have deep sympathy for the father. The child, my prayers are also worthless there, as I cannot help the child either. So pray all you want, I just don't see what those prayers will do/ It is a lovely gesture but the reality is that making an example of this idiot mother whose foolishness got her son killed, that will have a more subsequent impact than anything else at this point.

Comment_arrow

Ed M

6:42 am on Sunday, November 11, 2012

Really??? You don't see how this is so different???? Drinking then driving is not a tragic mistake - it is an irresponsible choice! This incident was a tragic accident that was not caused by being impaired!

Who are you praying for? The family of Maddox! Are you that cold hearted???

Comment_arrow

Ryan

8:34 am on Sunday, November 11, 2012

So drinking and driving is an irresponsible choice but putting an infant child up on the ledge of a pen filled with vicious animals is a mistake? The difference between the two based on your logic is impairment. Doing something dumb and dangerous while impaired and making the choice to be impaired in your view is different than making a dumb decision while not impaired.

There are signs everywhere saying, "Don't stand on the ledge" and then another sign basically saying "knock it off." Here this mother made a conscious decision to be irresponsible. So would a better comparison be that she was texting while driving and killed her child, or how about if she dangled her child over the way Michael Jackson did and dropped it? Both are reckless endangerment.

As for prayers, I don't see the value in wishing for them to feel better. Simply wishing isn't going to make it so or ease anyone else's pain. Making an example of a situation like this, so people think before making stupid decisions, might actually prevent pain for others in the future.

Comment_arrow

erika

12:52 pm on Sunday, November 11, 2012

I would argue that not being impaired makes this an even more egregious error than drinking and driving, when one would not be of "sound mind". I am certainly sympathetic to this family and have shed my own tears over the situation as well as donated a truck. However, while I am not unsympathetic to the mother/family, I don't think we have anyone else to whom we can assign blame except for the mother. I think we all need to step back and recognize that this was a tragic lapse in judgment, and others who do follow the rules should not be punished as a result. (not saying they shouldn't remove the dogs to another zoo, simply to not have that reminder, but I don't want to see other areas of the zoo being restricted due to this one horrible tragedy).

loran

8:49 am on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Not the mother, i pray for that poor kid who was alive wen gt mauled to death and ppl just watched. Pathetic

Reply

Amanda King

10:21 am on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Hi Stephanie,

I never stated that a fence should have a seat for a child to sit on and view. Please read ny post again.

Thanks

Reply
Comment_arrow

Stephanie

10:38 am on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

My apologies, I was talking to Sean J Denti in that comment.

Beverly Bernard

11:21 am on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

May the first person who has never done something foolish or made a poor judgement feel free to condemn here. This family has suffered a tragic loss and will never be the same. It is time for some empathy rather than judgement. I also regret the loss of an endangered animal and these wild animals were only doing what wild animals do. The unfortunate child was prey or dinner.

Reply

Amanda King

1:52 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Yes, none of us are perfect, and we all make mistakes. However, there is such a thing as Common Sense, and Common Knowledge, of which this child's mother had neither. Let me break it down for you. Common sense says, if I put my child up on this ledge, he could fall and those wild animals could eat him. Common knowledge says, my son cannot fly should he fall, and these rules were placed here for a reason. I should definitely obey them. I have a huge compassionate heart, but whenever I hear of anything bad happening to a child, I get very angry. I could care less about the grownups because they can help themselves, and children are very vunerable.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Beverly Bernard

3:35 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

I think we can agree that neither common sense nor common knowledge was in play that day, however a lapse in judgement resulted in the worst tragedy imaginable and the mother will be punished enough for the rest of her life without help from comments here.

Comment_arrow

Pamela fabian

9:45 am on Sunday, November 11, 2012

I've been saying the same thing all week. My 13 year old daughter ask me why the mother didn't jump in to save her child. I said thats a good question. If I was there i would have jumped in. I would have got hurt bad but, i don't think i would have died. I feel bad these people have to live with such a stupid mistake.

loran

2:17 pm on Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Very true . The baby didnt know better, he trusted that mother of his and look where he is now. Kids and animals cannot help themselves thats what we r here for. Yes we all make mistakes but wen it comes to our kids there is no excuse especially for something that dumb

Reply

Sally Zabo

5:44 pm on Saturday, November 10, 2012

I am a grandma to a two year boy. I too had visited the zoo two weeks before, with my two daughters and grandson. We too had stopped at the platform. I stood at that window and thought to myself that if some child had a mind to could climb on railing, jump on net and swing down into pit. Or stand at window and throw harmful things in past that net, and injury the animals. YES, Animals! I wish you would not call them dogs! Told my grandson when he called them doggies.NO...they are not doggies. He viewed them with his feet on the ground. He waited up for better view. My daughter held him up in her arms back away from window. That still made me nervous and I wanted to leave area. The animals were boring laying in piles far end of pit. But I do wished these ones are destroyed. I can see ever going to zoo and letting my grandchild stop at that area without wondering if they see lunch in every small child staring at them since they have killed that easy prey before. Moving them would only put another city in danger. What if they escape again. Zoo is surrounds by houses. RIP BABY BOY my prayers are you.

Reply

Sarah jobesJrnascar

9:39 am on Friday, December 7, 2012

the mother should be charged, it is her fault and not the zoo's or animals fault. Had she had put her child on a railing overlooking a lake and and he fell in, she would have pRobally been charged. I think the DA felt sorry for the family. Sorry she should have been charged. it is her fault that baby died

Reply

Leave a comment