patching...
Breaking: Traffic Accident Causing Delays on West Liberty »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Dormont Civil Service Commission Overturns Phil Ross' Demotion From Chief

The commission found the borough's evidence against Ross insufficient to support charges that included insubordination.

 

Dormont’s Civil Service Commission overturned Phil Ross’ demotion from police chief to sergeant, rejecting the borough's claim that Ross was, among other things, insubordinate and failed to run the department as council and management wanted.

The three-member commission voted unanimously Tuesday night and said Ross should be reinstated with back pay.

Ross said he was pleased, but declined further comment. He faces an Aug. 6 appeal hearing of his demotion to patrolman for disconnecting GPS units in police cars.

About 30 Ross supporters—including Mayor Tom Lloyd, councilwoman Joan Hodson and police officers—in the audience applauded the ruling.

"It's a great result for Phil," said his attorney, D. Scott Lautner. "It's the first of several steps for him to get vindication and show that we're right: it's a personality conflict. It's a shame that there's so much wasted money from the Borough of Dormont over this issue. There were many ways that this could have been handled without expending thousands of dollars in legal fees for charts, graphs and everything else (presented by the borough at the appeal hearing.) But for reasons unknown, they've chosen not to do that."

"The voters are the ones that are really going to sit back and take a look at what's happened and see: 'Did this need to happen?' and I come back to the same thing: why do you attack, personally, a man who's already put 27 years in, doesn't have a blemish on his record, and has for all intents and purposes retired?" he said, referring to Ross' participation in the borough's deferred retirement option plan.

Neither Borough Manager Gino Rizza nor any council members who voted to demote Ross in March were present. Chris Gabriel, the borough's labor attorney, said the borough would appeal to the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas.

"The standard by which the commission was required to review the case was: 'Was there substantial evidence to support the charges brought by borough council?' The commission was presented with six hours of testimony and approximately 30 exhibits, including exhibits included by Phil Ross where he admitted responsibility for at least one of the things for which he was charged"—failing to properly maintain vehicles—Gabriel said.

Charges included (see photos of commission documents) failure to manage the schedule efficiently, failure to keep Rizza and council reasonably informed of police activity and failure to effectively carry out discipline.

But the commission said it was bound by law to dismiss the charges based on insufficient evidence.

“The Civil Service Commission has no personal or political connection to Phillip Ross or members of borough council. The Civil Service Commission decision in this case is based solely upon the evidence presented, and it finds the evidence to be both insufficient, as a matter of law, and further finds that the evidence is not credible, to sustain the charges brought,” its ruling said.

Commissioners Mary Cothran, Don Militzer Sr. and George V. Papuga III declined to further elaborate.

Gabriel found it peculiar the commission would state it had no connection to Ross or council.

"Why would they say that," he said. "It doesn’t seem like there's any questions as to whether they have a political connection to borough council."

Lautner said he needed to discuss with Ross what duties Ross would perform at work in light of the ruling, but said Ross would do "his job, like he always does."

The borough has hired Richard Dwyer as acting chief for $5,500 a month.

Related Topics: Dormont, Gino Rizza, Mayor Tom Llloyd, Phil Ross, and dormont council

dormonter

1:14 am on Wednesday, July 27, 2011

I think that the unanimous findings that the boro's case was not credible, not just "insufficient" should be emphasized. Not believable. And they didn't even have the guts to show their faces at the decision. The Gabriel brothers are incompetent and/or just interested in billable hours to let this debacle move forward as it was, now they want to appeal?! Mr. Gabriel, the commission stated that they have no dog in this fight because they wanted it on the record that this is a personal and political attack that is obvious to a disinterested observer. Is this your first civil service appeal? They clearly saw thru the lying testimony of council and the "manager" and your dog and pony show exhibits. You should be sued for legal malpractice for stealing taxpayer money and even further legal action as you allowed your clients to knowingly lie under oath. This isn't a political campaign smear literature drop or robo-call, this is testimony under oath.

Reply

dm

7:30 am on Wednesday, July 27, 2011

Good for Chief Ross. Voters - take note!

Reply

MSgt. John DeLallo

7:33 am on Wednesday, July 27, 2011

There is nothing in Commonwealth code that prevents a member of council from resigning in mid-term, or for that matter, the day after elections. I wonder how many of the council members who have been over-ruled will take the honorable way out and simply resign from council. I also wonder how many will continue to sully Dormont's reputation as the "Mount of Gold"; relatively intact since 1909, but nearly ruined by current council. Do the right thing and leave office early. You'll save face, and perhaps personal pecuniary liability, and make Dormont a better community.

Reply

Jeff

7:48 am on Wednesday, July 27, 2011

A memo to council and boro managment:
In early 2010 you picked a fight with a well respected and very well qualified Fire Chief, all based on mis-information and really bad judgement on your parts. After the storm you created manifested itself into support from all over the South Hills as well as giving you all a solid dose of THE TRUTH, you did the right thing and unanimously overturned your decision and chose to support the Fire Chief.
Now here we are mid 2011, and the fight you picked with a well respected and very well qualified Police Chief just took a turn for the worse for YOU. Last night you got another dose of THE TRUTH, it's just sad that 95% of you were cowards and didn't show to take that dose. You made a decision based on mis-information (hence the over-ruling by the Civil Service Board) and worse than that, based on personality differnences. You are in the middle of the storm that you all created for yourselves. It it the 12th round, you are on the ropes, and you are about to go down.
So, please take the time to realize that you stand absolutely no chance in appealing your case. You now have a golden opportunity to show at least a little interest in doing the right thing here. DROP PHIL'S DEMOTION TO PATROLMAN AND DROP ANY BAD IDEA OF AN APPEAL OF LAST NIGHT'S DECISION. Another opportunity while you are at it, drop Dwyer and his budget busting $5500. You will need every dime of it to pay all of Phil's back pay!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bryan

8:40 am on Wednesday, July 27, 2011

Jeff:

Very well said and great points made. They continue to pick fights that they not only lose but lose bad and look bad in the process, and to not even have the guts to show up? You all continue to show the residents how incompetent you all really are. Do us all a favor and for the last few months of the year chill out and stop making Dormont look so bad everyday in the news! You lost again! Let this finally be a sign to end all the madness.

Comment_arrow

Frank Fabus

12:14 pm on Wednesday, July 27, 2011

So true Jeff. This counsil also has racked up sooo much in lawyer fees. Also, how is this new Chief doing in controlling the overtime for the police department? I understand that it's out of control and high. Our police, to the man are the most professional that I have ever met. They do there job. A friend of mine asked, why do you even need police in Dormont there is such little crime. Well, that's why, our police force is well respected and do there job's above and beyond. I also wonder, why none of the council members other then one were there. Was it because all along this was a witch hunt and when they failed at it, the ran and hid??? Is this still a personal vendetta against the police by a member or borough employee for their being arrested by one of our finest?? In November please come out and vote and let your voice be heard. We need a complete turnover to get our elected leaders to listen to what we the voters want. And to the new people running, don't change your party once you are elected, that's just wrong.

xxxxx

8:13 am on Wednesday, July 27, 2011

I would think that if this Council goes through with an appeal it might be because of Gino trying to prove a point. He doesn't care about this borough he only cares about himself. He doesn't like Denny, look how that turned out. He doesn't like Phil look how it has turned out so far.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Frank Fabus

12:17 pm on Wednesday, July 27, 2011

I would like to know if Gino was ever arrested by one of the police officers involved. Can anyone answer that??? Dan, in all your reporting have you ever come up with this answer?

robert t

9:36 am on Wednesday, July 27, 2011

Nice to move forward. Would be even nicer if the court's time is spared of an appeal, and they all wiped to the slate clean to work better together. Also, shouldn't this reversal negate the demotion from Sargent to patrolman? He's chief of police now, so even if that demotion is upheld, they can't really demote him from sargent.... can they?

Reply
Comment_arrow

MSgt. John DeLallo

9:45 am on Wednesday, July 27, 2011

It would appear that this council will do anything they please, regardless of the expense to Dormont taxpayers. You can bet that if this money was coming out of their pockets (and there are legal precedents for personal pecuniary liability when government officials violate their oath and act as rogues or mercenaries) this outrage would never have happened. Of course under the guidance of the omnipotent Rizza, who has Svengali'd the unwashed with his mastery of local government, who knows. I wonder if Rizza understands that being a screw up is one thing, but vindictive behavior can land you in civil court? If the lot of them had a lick of sense, they'd run for the hills, never to be seen again.

maria

1:24 pm on Wednesday, July 27, 2011

It has been decided! The Chief is back! Therefore his demotion to patrolman should be negated No questions there. So,we no longer need an interim chief. I think $5,500 dollars should be enough for time served. Council should cut their losses now without costing the boro thousands more for useless attorney fees. I'm sure that if someone could get a pettition going for impeachment of certain council members and or the dissmissal of boro manager and assistant manager it would be filled with signatures!

Reply

Educating the Watching

2:45 pm on Wednesday, July 27, 2011

Maria, good point. There is actually case law that shows residents have successfully sued council members for misappropration of tax payers money. This may be an aveune for the residents to take. I believe the boro is now $20,000.00 dollars over budget for legal fees for the year. Imagine that and we are just half way thru the year.

Reply

Frank Fabus

7:29 pm on Wednesday, July 27, 2011

Good point Educating, but to sue this council would require them to use more of our tax dollars to give to there laywers. I have not got a reply on how the councils doing on cutting the overtime for the police they were so worried about. Last I heard, it isn't working too well and the police are working hard and with more overtime. Who will council blame this on besides themselves? Vote them all out in November....We need a slogan, like " they all must go" or "give us our borough back"..something that hits all the constituants. Then hire a boro manager that doesn't have a vendetta against our great police force...

Reply

maria

10:26 pm on Wednesday, July 27, 2011

so...to sue this council for misappropriations of tax payers money they would then still be able to missapropriate MORE of the tax payers money? One would think they should have to use their OWN money for a defense?....and I guess a simple pettition is out of the question? Maybe a pettition would at least get them to fire the inefficient managers? I am not a lawyer or a politician but maybe someone can figure out a way to stop this before November? I'm sorry if all I have are questions but i'm hoping someone will come up with an answer. I've actually been kind of proud to be a Dormonter but this council is making it hard to remain so.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Leah Petrilli

5:31 am on Thursday, July 28, 2011

Couldnt agree more Maria in fact I posted this very same thing on the OTHER story. If certain members of this boro council want to pursue a personal vendetta do it with your own money NOT ours. Money that could be better spent on other productive and USEFUL things. And as suggested by Ms. Malka robbing Peter to pay Paul by taking money from other departments should NOT be an option. That is most definitely NOT fiscal responsibility. I would be willing to sign a petition in order that the public's wishes can be illustrated to this council. Prior to November that is. And Maria never apologise for asking questions. It is your right as a citizen. Come to council meetings and ask away. May not get much of an answer but perhaps council will understand we are not senseless and are not willing to put up with this situation.

Jennifer Mcgoran-Kelly

11:41 pm on Wednesday, July 27, 2011

I am so happy that Phil has won this case, however this never should have happened in the first place.. Joan Hodson is the only counsil member that has defended the mayor, the defense of the police dept, as well as Phil, so when November rolls around I hope that we all keep that in mind when voteing. I have been to the council meeting and heard her defending them with my own ears . As far as I'm concerned I have never seen a borough that has been mismanaged as this one.. From the simple things from the wasted money on flower pots and murals for the pool to the demotion and humiliation of the fire dept and police dept. The whole council with the exception of Joan Hodson and Tom Lloyd NEED TO GO! You waste taxpayers hard earned money on legal fees and personal issues with the police department. the dormont council is a disgrace. I have seen more mature teenagers. Do us all a favor step down....We would be better off without a council at all because in my honest opinion it can't get any worse. Joan Hodson has been the lone voice of reason and professional behavior.

Reply

Leah Petrilli

5:44 am on Thursday, July 28, 2011

http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/pittsburgh/s_748691.html

And there you have it. If you disagree with this action please go to council and tell them so. In person. Make them look you in the eye and express your opinion. Call them, write them. Make them know your position as a citizen and taxpayer. It is YOUR MONEY and YOUR RIGHT.

Reply

maria

7:32 am on Thursday, July 28, 2011

Dwyer says in that article that it is up to council and the attorneys as to whether CHIEF ROSS will act as chief? I thought the demotion from chief was overturned in Tuesdays meeting and Chief Ross was to be reinstated with full back pay. Why then would he come back as a patrolman. He needs to come back as Chief as was ordered by a unanimous vote. If council spends another dime of the boros money on their appeal it NEEDS to come from their OWN pockets and in the meantime they need to follow the decision by the commission. How is ANYTHING up to the attorneys? They are Nothing to the citizens of Dormont If they are wanting to appeal do it Pro Bono better yet just GO AWAY!! Aren't there any attorneys living in Dormont who would want to sink their teeth into this incompetant council and their attorneys? Dwyer really needs to go because our Chif has been reinstated by the Civil Service Commision. His services are NO LONGER NEEDED

Reply

MSgt. John DeLallo

7:35 am on Thursday, July 28, 2011

Some have suggested that the Boro funds would be used to defend council members against a lawsuit for breaching their oath to serve the community. I'm not a lawyer, but I am a lobbyist. I would suggest to you that there are likely any number of lawyers in Dormont that would take this work on pro bono, find the particular section of Pennsylvania borough code that has been violated, and show how a citizen could file a criminal complaint against the individual council person, or council as a whole. That complaint would be at the magesterial level (Blase' office), who would forward it on to the Allegheny County DA for prosecution. ANY INDIVIDUAL could file a suit in civil court. In either scenario, I am fairly certain there is a way that personal pecuniary liability kicks in. That's a fancy way of saying that the council person would be forced to use there own cash to defend themselves.

Reply

MSgt. John DeLallo

8:03 am on Thursday, July 28, 2011

Maria:
Bravo! How astute, and I take it you are a citizen, not an attorney. Frankly, Dwyer's services were never needed. The justification for hiring him was police experience (I got that), no arrest authority (me too), and he can carry a gun openly (me too, and any other person not prohibited from firearms ownership) with certain limitations (sterile area of airport, post office, federal buildings, courthouses). Get Phil back in the saddle, drop the absurd demotion from sargeant to patrolman, send Dwyer packing, vote in November, and fire Rizza. Its just not that hard.

Reply

Tom F. Boyle

8:05 am on Thursday, July 28, 2011

So if you read the trib article, you see the saga will continue. If Ross wins the 2nd appeal will Dwyer then step aside? I think not, who wants to pass up an admin job paying 5500 a month when you also have retirement income. Bing windfall. You can't blame him. Shouldn't Dormont's solicitor have a say in wether or not we should appeal these cases? We taxpayers really didn't lose any income while Phil was demoted until they hired Dwyer. Other than Attorney fees. I wish I could right out checks and have someone else pay for it! I think it is time to look for some where else to live this is crazy! But then you look at Obama and Congress and start to think maybe I should find a whole new country not just a community. Where is the sanity in all of this????? Sorry just a little rant. Doesnt matter where you are imperfect people make imperfect decisions. Lets hope this Geno character and his crew come to there senses before we end up like the dems and republicans.

Reply

Lorenzo

10:29 am on Thursday, July 28, 2011

So now we are paying for 2 Cheif's saleries. Still saving us money are ya ? Council is a run away freight train. They could stand to take some lessons from Joan Hodson. I feel she is the only voice of reason on this Council. She is dignified and respectful and acts in the best interests of Dormont residents. This crap needs to stop NOW. Take your appeal and shove it, Quit wasting OUR money now ! you lost get over it. Take the offer Joan presented and get mediation for FREE ! Better yet Council take your health benifits and go see a shrink. Your egos are out of control and maybe a few hundred hours on a couch will do you some good ! Face it you wont be short on time to do so because November is right around the corner and your services wont be needed, heck we dont need you NOW !

Reply

Frank Fabus

12:14 pm on Thursday, July 28, 2011

I also agree with you Lornezo..

Reply

jodye

12:26 pm on Thursday, July 28, 2011

What is the point of appealing, the borough lost and now they want a second chance as they were not prepared for the hearing so they want to spend more of Dormont tax payers money to take it to court, just accept it and get on with the business at hand. Chris Gabriel of course is Labor law Attorney and wants to get all the money he can get from the borough, is the Borough Solicitor in agreement with these going on's. Mr. Rizza and his cronies need to go. I have lived in this Borough for 34 years and have never seen anything like this. What is the reasoning of spending 17,900.00 on four GPS Trackers and Camera systems?

Reply

Mary Beth Kovic

12:58 pm on Thursday, July 28, 2011

The panel stated [the evidence presented was], "...both insufficient, as a matter of law, and further finds that the evidence is not credible" This is a polite way of saying they thought they LIED. This group wants to continue to waste the taxpayer's money to appeal this? That's insane. According to the media the appeal was to have been filed either last night or today. What I want to know is who directed the attorney to file an appeal?

Reply

Go Dormont

3:24 pm on Thursday, July 28, 2011

Let's hope patrolman Ross and chief dwyer get along!

Reply

Frank Fabus

4:10 pm on Thursday, July 28, 2011

I hope he won't be "patrolman Ross" for long and is reinstated as Chief Ross

Reply

xxxxx

6:15 pm on Thursday, July 28, 2011

According to Dan the appeal was filed. I would like to know when did Council vote on this? There has not been a voting meeting for them to vote. So there goes more money down the drain.

Reply

Lorenzo

6:31 pm on Thursday, July 28, 2011

Let me remind everyone on just what a joke council made of themselves during the first hearing when council president who was sequestered and busted out right on receiving texts from a certain attorney during this hearing while being sequestered. Has any charges been filed on that ? And council thinks a appeal will hold water ? Their credibility is down the toilet, they need to just GIVE IT UP ! I think we should rent a fleet of donkeys so certain members of Council can follow Drew down West Liberty Ave when he rides his . Lets make it this November. Mary Pitcher, bring your camera ! And to Drew.......NEVER underestimate the POWER of an underestimated woman !

Reply

Lorenzo

6:34 pm on Thursday, July 28, 2011

By the way when I see Phil Ross I WILL address him as CHIEF !

Reply

dormont life time residnet

8:45 am on Friday, July 29, 2011

the .... is finally hitting the fan. why do you think tomasky retired with only 3 years left. he saw the writing on the wall and he was going down too. has not one of you heard about the blues overtime game. i say this is all karma. patrolman making over 150.000 a year in dormont is absurd. it is about time we clean out garbage in this police force. and again i wish mr drwyer would add up all the fines our mayor dimissed. with a lot of the same tickets being dissmissed for the same people, freind of your tom? seems the mayor takes care of his own. if we would have collected all this money maybe tom could have paid for the new acting chief, who seems to have his own agenda. Patrolman phil your are not above the law and you and that prehistoric mayor should just bow out with what little dignity you have left

Reply
Comment_arrow

MSgt. John DeLallo

9:15 am on Friday, July 29, 2011

dormont life time residnet--First, I'd like to know what a residnet is, but we'll chalk that up to a mis-spelling. Frankly, the rest of your diatribe is about as silly as your mis-spelled screen name. Your comment on Bill T. borders on libel. If indeed you are, as someone indicated, actually a member of council, your comments regarding Mayor Lloyd are similarly libelous, and Boro monies won't defend you if either Bill or the Mayor decide to seek you out and file suit against you. Just a fair warning to an obviously out of touch "residnet". I'd be remiss if I didn't thank you for my daily chuckle. I love to laugh out loud at least once each day, and you sir (or madam) are extraordinarily laughable. Hmm, I wonder how tough you're going to talk when the Constable arrives to serve you with papers? Now THAT would make me laugh for a week. O.K., you may now go back under your rock.

Comment_arrow

mmt555

9:43 am on Friday, July 29, 2011

Well since they're garbage then why don't you go put your life on the line everyday. No matter what you think, these men have families that don't appreciate people like you who run their mouth about things they have no idea about. By the way, 150,000? Yeah not really buddy.

Lorenzo

9:02 am on Friday, July 29, 2011

Get over it dormont life timer. Your seat on council is comprimised by your actions. You are the minority with your feelings in the matter the majority will remember in November when they vote.. Enough is enough paying these attorneys and such. They need to take the free mediation being offered !

Reply

Tom F. Boyle

9:04 am on Friday, July 29, 2011

Maybe he left because of all this crap! This is still a small town and if the police and Mayor don't want to charge us 110 for the same ticket that can be charged 15 isnt that good cutomer relations? The Boro still makes the same off of tickets! The Mayor may cut people slack on tickets for good reason, have you looked at all the cases and asked why they were dismissed? Don't be so quick to judge others! Also I beleive your numbers are off on wages. Its easy to sit back and say that overtime is not needed until you are the one needing police protection! We border the city and it is important that we are protected! I feel safe in this community! Even if the leadership is in disaray.

Reply

maria

10:39 am on Friday, July 29, 2011

Well, lets do the math $5500.00 x 4 =$22,000.00 WOW that's how much Dwyer will get if he stays 4 months not bad for a gig where so far he's going through old parking tickets?...PLEASE and as to Chief Ross's Aug 6 hearing about being demoted to patrolman over the dismantleling of GPS systems bought by Gino for $2000.00 (where they could have been gotten for free from Allegheny County) I thought i read that he was demoted from chief to sargent for that and if that is the case it already has been settled. Overturned by the commission He has been reinstated as Chief! He was the Chief of police when he directed officers to dismantle these. If anything Gino should be held accountable for the expense of these and the police department should get GPS systems from the county to be connected to 911 (NOT to Gino's laptop) After all the GPS units are for the safety and wellbeing of our officers...correct? And I too am a lifelong dormont resident. Just recently i had a minor incident that the police handled in a proffesional, courteous and timely maner. I have nothing but respect for our police department and what they are being put through right now sickens me. If nothing else this council does it should rethink the hiring of the boro managers and try to get it right before November.

Reply

dormont life time residnet

10:46 am on Friday, July 29, 2011

wpoop2 you name makes my laugh also. why don't you worry about where you live. are you making threats to me? do i need an attorney i have read that you have had all kinds of jobs and keep repeating you carry a gun. does this make you feel manly to keep talking about your gun. and do you want a medal for all the jobs and knowlege you protest. you have said you don't even live in dormont, worry about your own town. and get off your high horse and pay attention to your community....oh and i see that besides all the jobs you say you've had your are now a spelling teacher. seems like you have so many connections in this boro, maybe nobody wants to hear your crap in your own town. you are a popular boy...you know cops, mayors and now constables. i have lived in dormont for over 30 years...and us old timers do know who the slacker cops are. so watching tv on the job and not wearing regulated bullet proof vests, passing by illegally parked cars. and disableling police car gps's is all in good faith with the dormont police. my question is what else are they hiding. maybe you could pictch in some tax dollars and maybe people will actually care what you have to save.

Reply

BORN & RAISED IN DORMONT

11:09 am on Friday, July 29, 2011

dormont life time residnet maybe you should try spell check befor you send something out? It sounds to me like WOP2 hit a nerve with you?

Reply
Comment_arrow

MSgt. John DeLallo

11:30 am on Friday, July 29, 2011

Born and raised:
I think the tolerance level, education level, and intelligence level of the "resnident" is pretty much obvious to anyone reading his posts. I was going to answer him, especially on the gun issue, but its against my principles to have a battle of wits with an unarmed man:) Yes, I'm a lobbyist for the right of Pennsylvanians to keep and bear arms, and yes, I am always armed unless in a prohibited place or building. I will never shoot to kill, but may shoot to live. Trying to explain that concept to a nincompoop who likely doesn't know the backstrap from the muzzle of a pistol is much like teaching a pig to sing. Its a total waste of time, and at the end of the day, you serve only to annoy the pig. Its been my experience that those who have no regard for another's constitutional rights generally resort to hyperbole, innuendo, and junk science. Let the fool rant. When Officer Bill has him served with a suit for libel, we'll see how brilliant he is. Hit a nerve? I suspect I simply annoyed a pig:)

dormont life time residnet

2:31 pm on Friday, July 29, 2011

a fool, a pig, a nincompoop, low intelligence, no education ....annoyed by your comments, NOT AT ALL. i always consider the source of comments. and you seem to be a very lonely guy with a gun. waste of time am i...lol officer bill is just bill now...you really miss your power cop days. oh and now your a singing coach. watch you don't break your arm patting yourseld on the back. borm and raised i am waiting for the all power oz to teach me. and you are wasting all your talent and brains, on the patch, thats just ashame your knowlege is wasted on a comment blog. and your scare tactics don't effect me at all, they are so ex cop like. i can only guess your an ex-cop. because your surpreme attidude fits the bill. i am waiting for mr

Reply
Comment_arrow

MSgt. John DeLallo

6:00 pm on Friday, July 29, 2011

Uh, residnet, you sure seem to be hung up on guns. What's the problem, did you do something that precludes your owning one? As a matter of fact, I am an ex professional law enforcement officer, now retired. What, you don't like police officers either? Would I be stretching my imagination if I figured you for one of those pain in the rear end types that villify police officers--until you need one? I've run into hundreds of guys (and gals) like you. Usually I ran into them after they left car doors unlocked and were robbed, or mouthed off to the village idiot and got stomped, or similar circumstances. They always asked the same question--"where were you". Gee, maybe I was sitting on my fat behind at the clubhouse watching spankervision at taxpayer expense. Maybe I knew it was YOU, and deliberately delayed my response time. Perhaps I was plotting my latest outrageous scheme to get lots of overtime. It doesn't matter, because without fail, they'd answer the question for me, just like you.

Comment_arrow

dormont forever

9:41 pm on Tuesday, August 2, 2011

wop2, fyi i belong to the NRA, and don't have to brag about my guns. could you please tell these nice patch people about the blues overtime game. so they can understand the over 100,000 dollars the police make in a year in this tiny town that brags about low crime. i am sure your remember. you seem to be the smartest man on the patch. i see so many typos on here why don't you comment on all them, or you just like me best. now be truthful or i won't let you have any more chuckles. burke making 146,000 a year and people feel bad for him. theres your joke

BORN & RAISED IN DORMONT

4:28 pm on Friday, July 29, 2011

dormont life time RESIDENT you are on this comment blog are you waisting all you talent, knowledge and brains on the patch?

Reply

Lorenzo

5:31 pm on Friday, July 29, 2011

Ok lets get the Bill retirement thing straight people. I know for fact that he chose retirement because another door opened for him at this junction of his life. so he closed the door on his employment here. He wont be sitting doing nothing as you would all like to think. He took this new venture in his life and I am happy for him and not so inclined to share with anyone here the details as they are Bill's personal business. I applaud him from stepping away from all the drama lama;s here. He has served this community well.......Thank you Bill !

Reply
Comment_arrow

MSgt. John DeLallo

5:52 pm on Friday, July 29, 2011

I second that. I spoke to Bill several weeks ago when I learned of his retirement. For the ill informed, naysayers, and generally crabby folks who think Bill pulled up stakes because he fears you, try again. You all made it easier for him to move on, and when your home is robbed, or your car vandalized, or you are accosted on the street, think about the crap you wrote about Bill and the rest of the PD. You ninnies have no idea of how dedicated a force you have.

Leave a comment